RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The discrepancies between the objective and subjective measurements used to select and fit hearing aids indirectly impact the perceived benefit and perception in the presence of noise. This study aimed to bridge the gap between objective and subjective measurements in hearing aid fitting by adapting and validating the "Perceptual Performance Test (PPT)" in Malayalam. Subjects and. METHODS: Standardized Malayalam-language sentences were used to adapt PPT and administer it to 65 native Malayalam speakers (30 normal and 35 hearing impaired). Performance and perception speech recognition thresholds in noise (SRTN) and Performance-Perceptual Discrepancy (PPDIS) were evaluated at various noise levels along with Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) or Adults (HHIA). RESULTS: Both perceptual and performance SRTNs were better among normal-hearing individuals than in the hearing-impaired group. Moreover, the participants with hearing impairment were found to have a significant effect of noise level on both the measures, which was otherwise not seen among normal-hearing individuals. The normative criteria for PPDIS were established to categorize the individuals as under-, over-, or accurate estimators. The performance and perception outcomes varied significantly between groups (normal hearing and hearing impaired) and across noise levels. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between perceptual and performance SRTNs with emotional and social subscales and total HHIE/A scores. Additionally, a negative association was noted between PPDIS values and HHIE/A scores. CONCLUSIONS: The adapted test is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating the benefit of hearing aids. PPDIS can provide crucial information to audiologists regarding an individual's judgement about their hearing ability, with an explanation for the discrepancy between objective and subjective reports of hearing impairments.
RESUMO
The present study aims to identify the objective tests that can identify hidden hearing loss in a group of individuals exposed to occupational noise, which is not otherwise evident as a clinically relevant permanent threshold shift. A standard group comparison design was used to study the hidden auditory effect of occupational noise on traffic police officers. A total of 50 participants (n = 25 exposed to occupational noise; n = 25 non-occupational noise-exposed) were included in the study. The test battery comprised of behavioral tests (hearing thresholds from 250 to 16,000 Hz), fine structure Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE's) as physiological measure, Click and CE-chirp® evoked auditory brain stem response (ABR) as electrophysiological, and Gap detection test (GDT) and Temporal modulation transfer function (TMTF) as psychophysical measures. Among the measures evaluated, extended high-frequency audiometry, fine structure DPOAE amplitude, CE-chirp® ABR, GDT, and TMTF showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the traffic police individuals exposed to occupational noise and the controls. However, routine audiometry and click-evoked ABR did not show any significant differences. The high-frequency audiometric thresholds, fine structure DPOAEs, CE-chirp® evoked ABR, GDT and TMTF have been shown to be affected in individuals exposed to occupational noise. This finding indicates a hidden hearing loss in the study group. Hence, this study paves the way for early identification and intervention of noise-induced hearing loss by including these measures along with routine test protocol in susceptible individuals.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Controversy exists as to whether auditory memory is modality-specific or not. To determine this, the study investigated the relation between the scores obtained on an auditory memory test with that obtained on a global memory test in adults. The study also aimed to compare the scores of young and older adults on the two memory tests. METHODS: Thirty young adults aged 18 to 30 years and 30 older adults aged 58 to 70 years, having normal hearing sensitivity, were studied. Auditory memory was evaluated using the 'Kannada auditory memory and sequencing test', while global memory was assessed using the memory domain of the 'Cognitive linguistic assessment protocol for Adults' and the 'Memory ability checklist'. RESULTS: No significant correlation was seen between the scores obtained on the auditory memory and the global memory tests in both young adults as well as older adults. Also, the scores on the memory ability checklist did not show any correlation with either global memory scores or auditory memory scores in both participant groups. Additionally, the scores of the three memory measures were found to be significantly different from each other. The older adults obtained significantly poorer scores on all three memory tools compared to young adults. CONCLUSION: The findings indicated that auditory memory is modality-specific and is independent of global memory. Additionally, all three measures were sensitive in detecting age-related decline in memory.
